PTW

See what you think

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/analysis-armstrongs-tour-blood-levels-debated#body

I think I take objection to this bit:

Quote

“As scientists, I think our job in this matter is that when something gets posted on the internet and is not normal, we need to say that this is the case,” said Belhage. “Otherwise, if you let it sit there and it is unchallenged, then it would [otherwise] be seen as perfect.

Actually a) that doesn't follow at all and b) even if it did the damage is less than if the media are invited to speculate over half-baked stories. The results are unusual, but we can't say anything so please invent your own conclusions.

Pure gutter science and pure gutter journalism.

Very well put Bill.

Again the sampling group is too small - 8 people - as the "experts" slip in right at the end of the article probably hoping we'll not finish reading it. Total trash